Mirena is an intrauterine device (IUD) which was produced by Bayer Pharmaceuticals to stop pregnancy for about 5 years. Mirena was authorized to be used as a contraceptive around 2000 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This product, although a very revolutionary method of contraceptive, has resulted in numerous life-threatening issues for consumers such as uterine perforation, device migration, ectopic pregnancy, as well as pelvic inflammatory illness. Ever since 2004, as reported by the FDA, there’s been a claimed 47,000 users experiencing negative effects of utilizing the product that has resulted in several Mirena lawsuits.
Roughly 8.5% of females in the US apply a certain type of reversible birth control. Although the Mirena IUD helps a lot of women successfully avoid pregnancy, this has been verified to possess severe adverse effects and victims are searching for compensation and justice coming from the pharmaceutical firm.
Hundreds of legal cases have already been filed and victims have gotten compensation for their accidents. You can find presently 30 Mirena lawsuits going ahead. Most often, users claim that the pharmaceutical firm didn’t alert them to the possible risks of the product. Also, they allege that the firm was aware of design flaws which caused the gadget to not work properly yet continued to manufacture and deliver defective medical products. Although there’ve been thousands of lawsuits throughout the country, there were 180 in New Jersey alone and there are more than 120 cases presently pending in the federal multidistrict court.
Miriam Cruz filed her Mirena lawsuit at the time the device she’d implanted around 2008 caused her extreme pain years following implementation. Bayer alleged that the sole method Mirena would migrate is if the doctor made a misstep during placement. Then again, considering that Cruz didn’t experience till many years right after placement, obviously the device did actually migrate. In her Mirena lawsuit, Cruz alleged that the firm didn’t correctly notify her of these risks and that the device wasn’t correctly displayed when she decided to use it.
A 24 years old women experienced permanent injuries following utilizing this IUD. As her only choice for elimination, this woman was forced to have the device operatively eliminated nevertheless the surgical treatment was not successful because it had migrated straight into her abdominal cavity. The 2nd surgical procedure was needed to eliminate the device coming from her abdomen. In her Mirena lawsuit settlement, she’s asking for payment for time, clinical costs, as well as suffering and pain.
Melody Williams filed a Mirena lawsuit making a claim that Bayer Pharmaceuticals was liable for fraud, irresponsible misrepresentation, as well as inability to alert clients of harmful effects. Williams began suffering from extreme stomach pain and cramps in just a year of her implantation. Her device was discovered to have moved through her right fallopian tube and needed surgical procedure to make it eliminated. Her first try to take out the device wasn’t successful that led to an infection and additional surgeries.
It is nearly impossible to find out the hazards of utilizing Mirena as Bayer works very hard in order to hide this information declaring that its use can make consumers “appear and feel good.” Victims looking for justice or needing financial settlement because of health care expenses must consider talking with a professional lawyer. Victims must have the pharmaceutical giant responsible for its actions.